"The International Court of Justice does not deserve its high status and name. I have been watching the recent debates between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and I have the impression that this organization is more of a political and lobbyist organization than a legal one."

Armenian political activist Ishkhan Verdiyan made these statements exclusive to Ednews. He emphasized that the decisions in the Court of Justice are not based on evidence but on the emotional speeches and emotional speeches of the politically advantageous party. 

"Either this court has limited resources and does not have its own evidentiary apparatus that can confirm or deny what the parties say, or it simply does not need such an apparatus, because the factual component does not play a decisive role in politically biased decisions. Court decisions are also often not binding, but are the basis for further manipulations, as the case of the Lachin Road Blockade perfectly demonstrated.

I think the only way to fight for your rights in this court is to have experienced professional lawyers from the country who can at least make him a laughing stock and prove his incompetence, even if they can't break the court's political agenda. On the other hand, legal disputes are always preferred over political disputes. Because, unlike political statements, statements in court always require evidence and include "ethnic cleansing", "genocide", etc. it is not possible to use these freely."

Akbar Novruz